![]() The latest version of the program has a wide variety of effects, titles, themes, and animations. It focuses on technical features, which helps to create professional movies and videos. This program provides more imaginable and useful features. It has more options and features for video editing for people who create high-quality videos, for example, for weddings, video advertising, and so on. It is a kind of mistake, as this program is made for professionals. Some people tend to think that in the Final Cut Pro X vs. The app offers a big variety of motion graphics templates, but templates themselves have very few customization options. For example, the app supports editing only two tracks. Lots of editing features: transitions, voice-over recording, color correction, and more.īasic functionality may be easy to master, but limiting for more advanced tasks. Videos can be shared across major social media platforms. The iMovie interface is quite easy to understand and convenient. You just add images and use themes and effects. With iMovie, every user can create family movies or clips without difficulties from various sources, which are DV-encoded files, video cameras. ![]() This program is well-known among iOS and Mac users. It is quite a standard app, which is a part of iLife. You need several clicks to understand how to edit and cut videos, add effects in iMovie. For example, capture, edit, and share a music performance. It is for people who want to do simple things. This program is devoted to amateurs and people who do not have special knowledge in video editing. Check out the results in the video above and leave a comment.This program is presented by Apple Inc. But if the performance of this machine is any indication, I am very excited indeed for a new M1-based full-sized MacBook Pro. Now, I would find editing in Final Cut Pro or creating motion graphics in Motion on a 13-inch screen to be an uncomfortable experience, so I’m not rushing to replace my 16-in MBP with this new machine tomorrow. Once again, the results were quite surprising. I then turned my attention to Motion, where I replicated a 3D object and a particle emitter to stress-test both machines. The fan on my machine kicked in for the render and export, while the M1 kept nice and quiet as it kept up with my (much more expensive) machine. Plus, I didn’t have the power supply for the M1 version so it ran on battery power for these tests, while my machine was plugged in. One thing that could have contributed to the results was that I was running Catalina on my 16″ MacBook Pro, and the 13″ M1 MBP came with Big Sur pre-installed. I set them up side-by-side, with the same (large) FCP library on identical Samsung T7 drives connected to each machine. Even so, I was quite shocked when I ran rendering and export tests in Final Cut Pro on both machines. This week on MacBreak Studio, I was able to “borrow” the new 13-inch MacBook Pro with the M1 Apple Silicon chip and so I did a few comparisons against my 2019 16″ MacBook Pro using both Final Cut Pro and Motion (by the way, it’s going to take me awhile to stopping adding the “X” to “FCP”).īear in mind that my 2019 MacBook Pro has the graphics card upgrade and 32GB of RAM, and the 13″ MacBook Pro is the basic issue model with no graphics card upgrade and a paltry 8GB of RAM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |